Search:
Home Other Sites:PS3  Wii  PC


Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Lockdown (Xbox)



Overall Customer Rating:3.7 out of 5
 
Graphics:(Not Yet Rated)
Sound:(Not Yet Rated)
GamePlay:(Not Yet Rated)
Addiction Level:(Not Yet Rated)

13 Customer Reviews

RRP: £8.99
Amazon Price: £8.99
You Save: £0 (0%)

Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours

Platform: Xbox
Publisher: Ubisoft
View other products by Ubisoft
Find out more about this
item at Amazon.co.uk

Write Your Own Review


Editorial: Boxed with instructions. Quick Delivery Guaranteed by Insured Post. Please take a look at all our other items in Playstation Manias Amazon Shop, Just click on our shop name above. All Items are in stock when listed and are dispatched within 48 hours.




Write a review for Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Lockdown (Xbox) and share your thoughts with others.



View All Amazon Customer Reviews...

3 out of 5  "Hours of fun but it's not and never will be Rainbow" - 11 September 2005
I think Lockdown is great but it isn't a Rainbow game (as we know it). It's the kind of game that I'd play when I got bored of R63 or R63BA.

As someone who pre-ordered 12 copies in total (for friends and family inc. myself) I feel a bit gutted to be honest. There's no doubts that it's a cracking game but I think too much has changed.

What really spoils it for me:

* The different uniforms which force us to have the marker above your team-mates head so you know he/she is on your team.

* The fact I don't know which player is speaking in-game.

* The poor radar/map - now I can't tell where people were killed or if they are on another level.

* The ability to talk to people on your team even when they're dead.

* The prevention of selecting different angles when viewing your team-mates (when you're dead).

* Not being able to boot people from the server while in-game.

* The poor sound effects for grenades.

* The removal of remote charges.

* Claymore Mines appear much weaker and less effective.

* Proximity Mines and proximity flashes are a waste of time.

* The disk errors that many people are experiencing e.g. game freezes when loading every so often.

* The removal of the clan features (although you can still have the clan tag like in Black Arrow).

* A poor and limited selection of maps.

* The screaming 'Rainbow' voice which cannot be turned off or down (although a patch is going to be released to lower this).

There's more complaints but these are the things that spoil my experience of the game for me personally.

The PEC mode is great and if it wasn't for this feature I wouldn't entertain the game at all. Had this been added to Black Arrow with a selection of new maps then I would have been very, very happy.

Graphics in the game are sweet. Very nice; a big improvement without a doubt.

Personally if you like off-line play then this game is great. If like me you're more into online gaming then yes, it will keep you entertained for a long, long time, especially when the bugs are fixed. However if you're a die-hard Rainbow fan then you'll probably enjoy R63 and Black Arrow more even though they are basic in comparison.

On paper Lockdown sounds great. I have followed the developers diaries and videos for months. They really excited me yet how they failed to see so many errors and problems is beyond me. The Rainbow games have such a following it would have made common sense to get in half a dozen serious clans/gamers to play this game first. Not only would they have spotted the bugs but they would have pointed out the basic downfalls, some of which I have listed above.

It was a great idea to develop this game but whoever is responsible at the top for giving the green light should be outed from their position because they obviously do not know what the Rainbow fans want. For me progression is fine and yes some sacrifices may have to be made for new features and ideas but what idiot thinks it's right for the dead to be able to talk to the living for example?

The developers behind the game were obviously very excited but they failed to deliver a masterpiece which is a real shame because had they not made so many silly mistakes, this game would have been amazing.

Now don't get me wrong, it's still a good game. If you have never played the previous titles then you'll probably wonder what I'm talking about as you won't know any different. Newbies should buy it, die-hards should (and will out of loyalty) too. But UBI, take note... when making the next game, if you decide to go down that road, take on board the opinions of the gamers, especially the die-hards and not just the casual Rainbow fans.

Ok just because I class myself as a die-hard doesn't make me right but I do feel that there are too many fundamental cock-ups in this game.

I want this game to be the best and that's why I'm so passionate about how I see it.

Fix these problems, admit you cocked it up and produced a game that is no more unique than the others already out there. For me R63 and Black Arrow may be simple but they do the business. Tweaking them rather than starting from scratch would have been much better.

I'll keep playing Lockdown and I'll urge others to buy it but if I'm honest, I expect the PEC feature to become boring in time and then I see people defecting back to the earlier versions.



2 out of 5  "Not worthy of being called "Rainbow"!" - 26 September 2005
As a dedicated Rainbow fan I jumped high with euphoria at the news that Ubisoft were releasing a sequel to 6.3 & Black Arrow. Sadly, I hit the floor with a resounding thump!

This game does not live up to the reputation of its predecessors. Having played both the previous games to death (& then some...) I can sadly say that this falls seriously short of the mark for the following reasons:

1. The movements of your team members in the missions are jumpy, occasionally erratic & about as lifelike as a glovepuppet.

2. The missions, even on elite, are as hard as butter left out in the sun.

3. Worst of all - the gameplay where you take on the role of dieter Weber (Sniper) is dreadful! Having fired a few rifles in my time I expected there to be some kind of kick back recoil after each shot but no - you can almost do rapid fire without loosing your aim! & as for when the helicopter changes position - don't start me off... its worse than the old arcade games of the '80s...!

4. The removal of some of the weapons was a dire move & the charts for comparison are now over-simplified.

There are some areas where I can see an attempt at improvement - The weapons in zoom mode actually fire at the point where they are aimed so you need to be good (I never play with aim enhamcements on so this made for more realisim) & there is recoil etc with these guns. The explosions are muted but you'd expect that as Rainbow would wear earplugs. Also, its a nice touch to be able to blast doors open with the shotguns (A++ for that...!)

Sorry Ubisoft - whoever signed this off deserves a slap from Mr Clancy as this is not worthy of his name.

I'll think twice before buying another Rainbow game.

This isn't a Rainbow - its an overcast, wet Monday morning...!



2 out of 5  "Not worthy of being called "Rainbow"!" - 26 September 2005
As a dedicated Rainbow fan I jumped high with euphoria at the news that Ubisoft were releasing a sequel to 6.3 & Black Arrow. Sadly, I hit the floor with a resounding thump!

This game does not live up to the reputation of its predecessors. Having played both the previous games to death (& then some...) I can sadly say that this falls seriously short of the mark for the following reasons:

1. The movements of your team members in the missions are jumpy, occasionally erratic & about as lifelike as a glovepuppet.

2. The missions, even on elite, are as hard as butter left out in the sun.

3. Worst of all - the gameplay where you take on the role of dieter Weber (Sniper) is dreadful! Having fired a few rifles in my time I expected there to be some kind of kick back recoil after each shot but no - you can almost do rapid fire without loosing your aim! & as for when the helicopter changes position - don't start me off... its worse than the old arcade games of the '80s...!

4. The removal of some of the weapons was a dire move & the charts for comparison are now over-simplified.

There are some areas where I can see an attempt at improvement - The weapons in zoom mode actually fire at the point where they are aimed so you need to be good (I never play with aim enhamcements on so this made for more realisim) & there is recoil etc with these guns. The explosions are muted but you'd expect that as Rainbow would wear earplugs. Also, its a nice touch to be able to blast doors open with the shotguns (A++ for that...!)

Sorry Ubisoft - whoever signed this off deserves a slap from Mr Clancy as this is not worthy of his name.

I'll think twice before buying another Rainbow game.

This isn't a Rainbow - its an overcast, wet Monday morning...!



5 out of 5  "Great, quite simply blows black arrow out of the water" - 30 September 2005
Reading other people reviews you may get the impression that this game is bad. Well it's not! The people giving it bad reviews seem to be saying it's bad because it's different. This is because they are narrowminded and don't like change. Well i say the changes in this game make it a much better experience to play online. You can create your own character and the more you play the game, the more weapons, equipment, skills you unlock, also you erm money so u can repair or buy more equipment, making the game more like an rpg, also the online mode is more tactical this time, as you sellect what kind of character you are. You can become a medic, and comando, a spec op and an engineer, and if u have one of each of these on ur team when u play online then it will help you dramatically. to sumerise this game basicaly, they have made the game deeper and more involving, and more varity of things to do, it's only those who played black arrow to death who seem not to like this game, but don't listen to them judge it for yourself you won't regret it



4 out of 5  "Good but different" - 12 September 2005
I absolutely loved Rainbow six 3 for the xbox and couldnt wait for this next one to come out. This review is mostly comparing this game to Rainbow six 3 as I played that game to death.
I must say the visuals on 'Lockdown' are very impressive and there is a definite real feel to the action. The game layout is a lot different and there is a very annoying nag when you get killed and want to restart from your last save point as you have to scroll through the options then click 'load game' then 'are you sure' button then go through the load game options and click the 'are you sure' button again and then wait for the game to reload which takes ages. When you are in the thick of the action it can be very frustrating. As for the weapons, its pretty similar to 3 but you also only get a basic grenade launcher without any optional extras such as tear gas, incedinery shells etc. There are lots of new guns to play with but to me they dont seem to be as good to use as in the last game, and terrorists dont run screaming when they are on fire they just seem to do some pathetic dance while burning. Explosions are also quite lame, more of a fizzle than a wopping bang when u pop a flammable barrel or throw a grenade. But overall the game is very challenging and it is great, although not as great as I was expecting but nevertheless it is definately worth buying.



4 out of 5  "Love it!!" - 14 January 2006
Just bought the original XBOX, so this is obviously the first game I have and I can't keep away from it. Could do without the sometimes jerky movements of the team members but otherwise, this is a very enjoyable game.
The reviewer who claims to be ex SAS is lying. Those guys are the grey people whom you would never suspect as being members. They know better than to admit to being or having been members. Just another armchair dreamer...
Anyway - good game, enough to keep me up until 0230!!



4 out of 5  "Good but different" - 13 September 2005
I absolutely loved Rainbow six 3 for the xbox and couldnt wait for this next one to come out. This review is mostly comparing this game to Rainbow six 3 as I played that game to death.
I must say the visuals on 'Lockdown' are very impressive and there is a definite real feel to the action. The game layout is a lot different and there is a very annoying nag when you get killed and want to restart from your last save point as you have to scroll through the options then click 'load game' then 'are you sure' button then go through the load game options and click the 'are you sure' button again and then wait for the game to reload which takes ages. When you are in the thick of the action it can be very frustrating. As for the weapons, its pretty similar to 3 but you also only get a basic grenade launcher without any optional extras such as tear gas, incedinery shells etc. There are lots of new guns to play with but to me they dont seem to be as good to use as in the last game, and terrorists dont run screaming when they are on fire they just seem to do some pathetic dance while burning. Explosions are also quite lame, more of a fizzle than a wopping bang when u pop a flammable barrel or throw a grenade. But overall the game is very challenging and it is great, although not as great as I was expecting but nevertheless it is definately worth buying.



1 out of 5  "NOWHERE near as good as the others" - 8 October 2006
I have always loved the rainbow 6 games(Raven Shield for the PC being by far the best and most tactical) and tbh i dont even consider this a true rainbow 6 game.
There are NO tactics involved whatsoever, you can literally walk into a room by yourself without your team (who are utterly useless) and easily shoot everyone with one bullet each! One time i walked into a room with 3 'baddies', and had to reload, i stood in the middle of the room and reloaded whilst none of them hit me, just BAD!!
REALLY [...], the graphics are also terrible and the team all have characters including 2 ladies, all of which provide many cheesy, cringe-worthy lines such as "ok amigo, lets go" which just makes me wanna puke to be honest!!!
[...]
- Cal



5 out of 5  "Best Clancy game yet," - 10 October 2005
This has it all for those, like myself, who want convincing graphics, challenging scenarios and choicee of resources. When this comes in a Tom Clancy package it is well nigh irresistible.I only wish his recnt novels were half as interesting.

I do not play on-line so cannot even uderstand some of the criticisms form other reviewers (nor do I wish to). I also feel some usrs take things rather too seriously. It is, at the end of the day, only a game.

I would recommend this to anyone who enjoyed any previous Clancy game.



5 out of 5  "Best Clancy game yet," - 10 October 2005
This has it all for those, like myself, who want convincing graphics, challenging scenarios and choicee of resources. When this comes in a Tom Clancy package it is well nigh irresistible.I only wish his recnt novels were half as interesting.

I do not play on-line so cannot even uderstand some of the criticisms form other reviewers (nor do I wish to). I also feel some usrs take things rather too seriously. It is, at the end of the day, only a game.

I would recommend this to anyone who enjoyed any previous Clancy game.


Top 10 Selling Games
1 . Halo 3 (Xbox 360)
2 . Grand Theft Auto IV (Xbox 360)
3 . Gears of War 2 (Xbox 360)
4 . Far Cry 2 (Xbox 360)
5 . Saints Row 2 (Xbox 360)
6 . Fallout 3 (Xbox 360)
7 . Call of Duty: World at War (Xbox 360)
8 . Gears Of War 2 Limited Collectors Edition (Xbox 360)
9 . Pro Evolution Soccer 2009 (Xbox 360)
10 . Fable II (Xbox 360)
  More Top Sellers

Sponsored Links
Wii Fit stock and price comparisons


Official Xbox 360 Magazine


 


Contact | Terms of Use | Links

GHD Purple - GHD Pink - ghd Green - ghd Red - ghd Blue - Kinect Xbox 360

 © Copyright xbox360gamereviews.co.uk